Cases 61 - 70 of 77,213
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mills, Wallace v. Clay County Courts et al
as 1:2024cv21635
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mills
Defendant:
Clay County Courts and Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAZILL v. COTTON et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BRAZILL
Defendant:
COTTON, VIRGINIA LOCKEY and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan, Robert Lewis v. Osborne
as 1:2024cv21668
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Morgan and Robert Lewis Morgan Jr.
Defendant:
Jonathan Kent Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emanuel, Cornell v. Petrick et al
as 9:2024cv80545
Plaintiff:
Cornell Louis Emanuel
Defendant:
Whiilfield Petrick and Zuleger Candy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor, Daryl v. Dade Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv21651
Plaintiff:
Daryl Taylor
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldsboro v. Ivey et al
as 6:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Goldsboro, II
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Major Torquado, Jennifer Leca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
