Cases 61 - 70 of 10,373
SMILEY v. SMITH
as 1:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Marcus Smiley
Respondent:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALKER v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
BRODRICK M WALKER
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and ANTONIE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAGGINS v. USA
as 7:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
GARRY HAGGINS, JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PADGETT v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. PADGETT, JR
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TATE v. GEORGIA
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
ELBERT ROMAN TATE
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN BRIAN CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARRUTH v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE CARRUTH
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONYERS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, CAPTAIN HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARKE v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
JEROME CLARKE
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER and TEKETA JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS DIVINCI JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SAMPSON, WARDEN GRACE, CERT OFFICER LOCKHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEAL v. SHROPSHIRE
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DENORIA BEAL
Defendant:
RALPH SHROPSHIRE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
