Cases 61 - 70 of 9,316
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Doe v. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Robert Campbell and Robert Campbell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Porter v. GrafTech International Ltd. et al.
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
John C. Porter
Defendant:
GrafTech International Ltd., David Rintoul, Quinn Coburn and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shumate v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc. et al.
as 5:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Louise Shumate
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc., Compagnie Generale des Etablissements Michelin SCA, Michelin North America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Nations Lending Corporation v. Academy Mortgage Corporation et al.
as 1:2024cv00446
Defendant:
Kawai Hooper, Academy Mortgage Corporation, Leonard Pagan and others
Plaintiff:
Nations Lending Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Steelite International U.S.A. Inc. v. RAK Porcelain USA, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Steelite International U.S.A. Inc.
Defendant:
RAK Porcelain USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
