Cases 61 - 70 of 2,004
McAlister v. USA
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Earl McAlister
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logsdon v. Cassidy
as 6:2023cv00420
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Logsdon, Jr.
Respondent:
Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Henley v. USA
as 6:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Winford Lamont Henley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Joice v. Rogers
as 6:2023cv00376
Petitioner:
Brian Fredrick Joice
Respondent:
Mike Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Lawton Corr Rehabilitation Facility et al
as 6:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Kurk Johnson
Defendant:
Lawton Corr Rehabilitation Facility, Prison Officials Join with A.G.C.C. and Wardens at Both facilitys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Ledbetter
as 6:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
The State of Oklahoma and Kevin Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Bryning et al
as 6:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
David Bryning, Karen Hughes, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Law v. Bryant et al
as 6:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Jai'Quez Koreante Law
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Devra Atwood, Turnkey Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brauning v. Brooks et al
as 6:2023cv00349
Petitioner:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Respondent:
Michael Brooks, Jared Strand, Shannon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
