Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 7,807
Kim Hodges v. Joseph Abram, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff: KIM HODGES, personal representative for the estate of Michael Donte Molson
Defendant: JOSEPH ABRAM, BRAXTON CROWDER, Deputy, JASON KELLEY, Lieutenant and others
Donald Parsons v. USA, et al
as 24-3297
Plaintiff: DONALD L. PARSONS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Ryan Slowik, et al v. Keith Lambert
as 24-5132
Plaintiff: RYAN SLOWIK, VALERIE SLOWIK, A. S., Minor and others
Defendant: KEITH LAMBERT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1298
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1130
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chelesy Eastep v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 24-5320
Plaintiff: CHELESY EASTEP, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Landon Dwayne Eastep
Defendant: CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN and FABJAN LLUKAJ, in their individual and official capacity as an officer of the Mt. Juliet Police Department
Chelesy Eastep v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 24-5319
Plaintiff: CHELESY EASTEP, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Landon Dwayne Eastep
Defendant: CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, BRIAN MURPHY, in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, STEVEN CARRICK, in their individual and official capacity as an officer of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1118
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1119
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kim Hodges v. Joseph Abram, et al
as 24-1292
Plaintiff: KIM HODGES, personal representative for the estate of Michael Donte Molson
Defendant: JOSEPH ABRAM and STEPHEN DUMOND, Detective

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?