Cases 71 - 80 of 8,818
Caupp v. Parin
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Matthew Christopher Caupp
Respondent:
Captain Parin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. McConahay
as 1:2023cv02254
Petitioner:
Deonte Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acosta v. McConahay
as 1:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Jonathan Acosta
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Henderson
as 1:2023cv02279
Petitioner:
Tremain Hogan
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mobarak v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Soleiman Mobarak
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Wallace
as 3:2023cv02284
Petitioner:
Shad D. Mills
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. May
as 1:2023cv02215
Petitioner:
Larry D. Stewart
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. State of Ohio, et al
as 1:2023cv02252
Petitioner:
Rebeccah Lewis
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Respondent:
Warden Erin Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Warden Marion Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
James A. Russell
Respondent:
Warden Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clinkscale v. McConahay
as 2:2023oe04270
Plaintiff:
David B Clinkscale
Defendant:
Major Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
