Cases 71 - 80 of 10,124
Hamilton v. Teague et al
as 6:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Hamilton
Defendant:
Peter Teague, Walmart Albany Oregon and Michelle Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.S.S. v. Northern Oregon Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
J. S. S.
Defendant:
Northern Oregon Corrections and Josue Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Tyler Cox
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
J.G.T. v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
J. G.T.
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, FELICIA JONES and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alday v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00550
Petitioner:
Juan Alday
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGee v. Pedro et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Menphrey Douglas McGee
Defendant:
David Pedro, Liza Emory, B. Kubesh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collazo-Munoz v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00337
Petitioner:
Jaime Collazo-Munoz
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sawyer et al v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Kent Sawyer and Sandra Lynn Short
Defendant:
Deschutes County, L. Shane Nelson, Michael Schults and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America and Biden Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
David K. Case
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Chris Shupe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
