Cases 71 - 80 of 115
BLOOMFIELD STATE BANK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
BLOOMFIELD STATE BANK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BUSH et al
as 4:2010cv00035
Defendant:
MARK BUSH and TREASURER, COUNTY OF HARRISON, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
DELBRIDGE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv01447
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
SHERMAN & REILLY, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv01366
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BAKER et al
as 4:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDWARD B. BAKER, SHARON B. PALEN and JEFFERSON K. STREEPY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. YORK et al
as 1:2009cv01019
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT W. YORK, DONNA J. YORK, TIMOTHY C. YORK and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STROH et al
as 3:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDWARD F. STROH, SHERRY L. BROWN and CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HEIDINGSFELDER
as 3:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN ALLEN HEIDINGSFELDER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. COOKE et al
as 1:2008cv01415
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES L. COOKE, JR. and DOUGLAS P. LIVELSBERGER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv01186
Plaintiff:
WALLACE BRYANT and WALLACE BRYANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
