Cases 71 - 80 of 106
Redos v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 2:2008cv01036
Plaintiff:
John F. Redos, Jr.
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. Department of the Air Force et al
as 2:2008cv00869
Plaintiff:
Karen M. Taylor
Defendant:
Department of the Air Force and Michael W. Wynne
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Withrow v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2007cv02607
Plaintiff:
Darnell P. Withrow
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
White et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2007at01147
Plaintiff:
Ryan Victoria White and Estate of Walter D. White, by His Personal Representative, Ryan Victoria White
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
White et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2007cv02600
Plaintiff:
Ryan Victoria White and Estate of Walter D. White
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
White v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2007at01143
Plaintiff:
Ryan Victoria White
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Hale v. Enjalran et al
as 2:2007at01101
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Hale
Defendant:
Paul Enjalran, Dennis Stiffler and Ed Sabrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hale v. Enjalran et al
as 2:2007cv02500
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Hale
Defendant:
Paul Enjalran, Dennis Stiffler and Ed Sabrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
McDaniel
as 2:2007at00784
Plaintiff:
William R McDaniel
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
McDaniel v Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2007cv01745
Plaintiff:
William R. McDaniel
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
