Cases 71 - 80 of 140
USA v. $4,800.00 in United States Currency
as 7:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$4,800.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $14,781.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$14,781.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Earl Ashford
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $58,676.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$58,676.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $8,680.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$8,680.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $13,850.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$13,850.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $11,833.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2014cv00206
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$11,833.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Nathaniel Brooks
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $9,104.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$9,104.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. $5,485.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$5,485.00 in United States Currency and $2,900.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
William Harrel and Cindy Kaveh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. $10,021.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2014cv00195
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$10,021.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. $10,929.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$10,929.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
