Cases 71 - 80 of 7,456
Nussbaum v. Porch.com, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Paul Nussbaum
Defendant:
Porch.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lane v. Complete Maintenance Company
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Lane
Defendant:
Complete Maintenance Company
Su v. Avenger Products LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Avenger Products LLC and Kittrich Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Kirk v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Gary Kirk
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Wang v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Yu Wang
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Fletcher v. Bronner Bros., Inc.
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Princess Fletcher
Defendant:
Bronner Bros., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Warren et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Karon Warren, Deborah Kaplan, Kimberly Kavin and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Julie Su, Administrator Jessica Looman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hardage v. Arthur J. Gallagher, LLC
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hardage
Defendant:
Arthur J. Gallagher, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Black v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William David Black
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wright v. Ernst & Young, LLP
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Quinton Wright
Defendant:
Ernst & Young, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
