Cases 71 - 80 of 2,579
PERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00253
Petitioner:
EDWARD PERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00299
Petitioner:
EDWARD PERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BREWSTER v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EDWARDS v. GILLIS
as 7:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
PHIRRONNIUS EDWARDS
Respondent:
Warden SHAWN GILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARBER v. TELFAIR STATE PRISON
as 1:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
DANIEL BARBER
Respondent:
TELFAIR STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOLDEN v. JESTER
as 5:2023cv00310
Petitioner:
BRANDON BOLDEN
Respondent:
WARDEN T JESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLORENCE v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY STACEY JACKSON, CALVIN PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLORENCE v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSS v. WARDEN BEASLEY
as 5:2023cv00251
Petitioner:
CAREY LECELL ROSS
Respondent:
WARDEN BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. PERRY
as 1:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
