Cases 71 - 80 of 3,795
Dye v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jason Grant Dye
Defendant:
McIntosh County and Kevin Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Turnkey Medical Services
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Sheriff's Department and Turnkey Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnett v. Gabriel et al
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Glen Delane Arnett, Jr
Defendant:
Major Phillip Gabriel, K Hamilton, Lt. J Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. City of Claremore et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Lance Martel Woods
Defendant:
City of Claremore, Claremore City Police Department, Stan Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendenhall v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jessie Mendenhall
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Farrow
as 6:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
David M. Palmer
Defendant:
Nancy Farrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isham v. Stephens County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Pete Isham
Defendant:
Stephens County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Nelson
as 4:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Melvin LaMont Buck Meeks
Defendant:
LaQuesha LaShay Annette Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. McIntosh County, et al. et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Duke
Defendant:
McIntosh County, et al., McIntosh County Jail and McIntosh County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Gardner et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Andreil R Berry
Defendant:
FNU Gardner and Lawton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
