Cases 71 - 80 of 93
Shepherd v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01872
Plaintiff:
Kathy A. Shepherd
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fox v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01879
Plaintiff:
Gladys Mae Fox
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wright v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01878
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Wright
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eaves v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Carla Jean Eaves
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cavazos v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01871
Plaintiff:
Ruben Cavazos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc, Davol, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Luffman v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01854
Plaintiff:
George Andrew Luffman and George Andrew Luffman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Katechis
as 1:2007cv01852
Plaintiff:
Sophia Katechis and Nicholas Katechis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poston et al v. Davol, Inc
as 1:2007cv01846
Plaintiff:
Daniel Poston and Darline Poston
Defendant:
Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Campbell v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01845
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Campbell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc, Surgical Sense, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sayler et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01853
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Sayler, Robert H. Sayler, Lucinda Sayler and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc, Davol, Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
