Cases 81 - 90 of 29,409
Blackwell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01781
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Franklin Blackwell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Love v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01760
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Love
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Felten v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01777
Plaintiff:
Ralph Felten
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01757
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Freitag v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01753
Plaintiff:
Robert Freitag
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hopkins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01756
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hopkins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-1310
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
Hill v. Samsung Electronics America Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02099
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Albert C Hill
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America Inc., Tracfone Wireless, Inc.,, Safelink Wireless d/b/a Tracfone Wireless, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnston v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Plaintiff:
David Johnston
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Roy Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
