Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 6,043
VANDERPLOEG v. BLINKEN
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff: BELGIN J. VANDERPLOEG
Defendant: ANTONY BLINKEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
PARKER v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff: TIFFANY PARKER
Defendant: MURIEL BOWSER, ROBERT CONTEE, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HARRISON v. AUSTIN
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff: LORENZO HARRISON
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Inez Qtaish v. Washington D.C.
as 24-7028
Plaintiff: Inez Qtaish
Defendant: Washington D.C.
Gerald Da'vage v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, et al
as 24-7043
Plaintiff: Gerald D. Da'Vage
Defendant: District of Columbia Housing Authority, Ronald McCoy, Paulette Campbell and others
MARSH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff: Anthony Marsh II and ANTHONY MARSH, II
Not Yet Classified: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant: Anthony Delborrell, JOHN BEWLEY and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WORTHAM v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff: KRISTAL WORTHAM
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Christopher Demitry v. Mackenzie Rosman
as 24-7017
Plaintiff: Christopher Demitry
Defendant: Mackenzie Rosman
CLEMENT v. WASHINGTON POST
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff: AUDREY CLEMENT
Defendant: WASHINGTON POST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
SHABAZZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv00943
Plaintiff: KWAM'E LAKIM SHABAZZ
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANNA GREY, DALLAS WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?