Cases 81 - 90 of 149
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Paeda et al v. Mendiola et al
as 1:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Nurul Islam Paeda and Elizabeth Atalig Paeda
Defendant:
Melchor A. Mendiola , David M. Calvo , Brian M. Mendiola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Friends of Marpi et al v. Commonwealth Government et al
as 1:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Friends of Marpi , Christina-Marie E. Sablan , Suzy Kindle and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth Government , Coastal Resources Management, Department of Community and Cultural Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1983
Adlaon v. San Nicolas et al
as 1:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Quirino G. Adlaon
Defendant:
Dolores San Nicolas, Gregory F. Castro, Santiago Tudela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frink v. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands et al
as 1:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Frink
Defendant:
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands , CNMI Department of Public Lands and CNMI Department of Public Works
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kamruzzaman v. Micronesian Resort, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Aida S. Kamruzzaman
Defendant:
Micronesian Resort, Inc. and Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Northern Marianas Protection and Advocacy System, Inc. v. Faisao
as 1:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Northern Marianas Protection and Advocacy System, Inc.
Defendant:
Melvin Faisao
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
