Cases 81 - 90 of 746
Graham et al v. Leschly et al
as 1:2021cv10962
Defendant:
Mark Vachon, Nick Leschly, Daniel S. Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Soumya Vemuri, Venkata Chotneeru, Derivatively on Behalf of Bluebird Bio, Inc. and others
US Securities and Exchange Commission v. King et al
as 1:2021cv10714
Defendant:
Rahsaan King and Students of Strength, Inc.
Plaintiff:
US Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Victor D. Menashe v. Biogen Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10479
Petitioner:
Nadia Shash, Roman Suleymanov, Leonard Shapiro and others
Defendant:
Biogen Inc., Michael R. McDonnell, Jeffrey D. Capello and others
Plaintiff:
Victor D. Menashe and Amjad Khan
Iovin v Keith Patrick Gill, et al.
as 3:2021cv10264
Defendant:
MML Investors Services, LLC, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. and Keith Patrick Gill
Plaintiff:
Christian Iovin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Leung v. Bluebird Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10335
Plaintiff:
Peter Leung
Defendant:
Nick Leschly, bluebird bio, inc. and Chip Baird
Petitioner:
Ralph Petrillo and Jerry R. Hannah
Crossland v. Integrated Wealth Concepts, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10209
Defendant:
John Gennaro Cataldo, Paul A. Saganey and Integrated Wealth Concepts, LLC
Plaintiff:
Dianne Crossland
Shapiro v. Biogen Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10017
Defendant:
Alfred W. Sandrock, Jr., Michael Vounatsos, Biogen Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Shapiro
Petitioner:
Nadia Shash and The Biogen Investor Group
Ao v. Minerva Neurosciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10051
Defendant:
Minerva Neurosciences, Inc. and Remy Luthringer
Plaintiff:
Yuting Ao
Petitioner:
Nathan McCoy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ahn
as 1:2021cv10203
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Mark J Ahn
Raudonis et al v. Jarve et al
as 1:2021cv10329
Defendant:
Tyler Sosin, John Buttrick, John Jarve and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Davis, Walter Raudonis and David Holland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
