Cases 1 - 10 of 2,102
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
JULIE LYNCH, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, FREDERICK D. BENTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DRAPER v. BIDEN
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
LORETTA HILLWARE
Defendant:
JOHN BEAIRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKELLOP v. DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner:
JEFFREY A. MCKELLOP
Respondent:
DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2024cv00772
Petitioner:
WAYNE C. MORGAN
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VASS v. BRAWNER
as 1:2024cv00723
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER A. VASS
Respondent:
RONALD BRAWNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KEERIKKATTIL v. PETERS et al
as 1:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
RANJITH KEERIKKATTIL
Respondent:
COLLETE S. PETERS and WARDEN VICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. JAMISON
as 1:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
J. JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. JAMISON
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
J. JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv03122
Petitioner:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLEMING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
STEPHANIE LYNN FLEMING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FCI DANBURY and BALTIMORE RRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
