Cases 21 - 30 of 892
Galvan v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jodi Galvan
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reardon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Damon Reardon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Canfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Brian J. Canfield
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mulinix v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Kendra Michaela Mulinix
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Olson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Sara Morrill Olson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arduini v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Richard Adolph Arduini and Richard Adolph Arduini, Jr.
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Kyle Steven Taylor
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sharp v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jerold Sharp
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Baird v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Mark James Baird
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Amy Mae Robinson
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
