Cases 51 - 60 of 1,008
Belcher v. Little, et al.
as 1:2022cv00433
Petitioner:
Camron Belcher
Respondent:
Governor Brad Little, Sergeant Gann, Warden Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00342
Petitioner:
Ray Reynolds
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Kootenai County
as 1:2022cv00419
Petitioner:
Christopher James Sullivan
Respondent:
Kootenai County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Snyder v. Ramirez
as 1:2022cv00311
Petitioner:
James Snyder
Respondent:
Al Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Warden Davis
as 1:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
John Lee
Respondent:
Warden Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Twin Falls, Idaho District Courts, et al.
as 1:2022cv00345
Petitioner:
Michael E Jackson
Respondent:
Twin Falls, Idaho District Courts, Twin Falls County Jail and Ivy Medical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Ivy Medical, et al.
as 1:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jackson
Defendant:
Ivy Medical, Judicial Courts and Twin Falls County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apple v. Officer Chris Young et al
as 1:2022cv00309
Petitioner:
Brandon Apple
Respondent:
Officer Chris Young and Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoffman v. Rule
as 4:2022cv00290
Petitioner:
Monte Hoffman
Respondent:
Warden Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hoffman v. Rule
as 1:2022cv00278
Petitioner:
Monte G Hoffman
Respondent:
Warden Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
