Cases 1 - 10 of 922
Peters v. Apel et al
as 2:2024cv11296
Plaintiff:
Julie Elizabeth Peters
Defendant:
Colby Apel and Rokstad Power Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Taylor v. Langer Transportation
as 2:2024cv11282
Plaintiff:
Jamie Taylor
Defendant:
Langer Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Charafeddine et al v. Carson Freight, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11266
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Charafeddine and Wadad Charafeddine
Defendant:
Carson Freight, LLC and Jesus Odilfo Orduno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Davis v. Borojevic et al
as 2:2024cv11247
Plaintiff:
Caleb Davis
Defendant:
Dario Borojevic, JIT Road Transportation and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nada v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv11245
Plaintiff:
Lynn C. Nada
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Alhabal v. Battula
as 2:2024cv11249
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Alhabal
Defendant:
Srinivas Battula
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Hurthibise v. The United States
as 2:2024cv11214
Plaintiff:
Bryan Hurthibise
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Jevicks v. Hooper, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv10610
Plaintiff:
Teresa Jevicks
Defendant:
Charles Hooper, Jr. and Gray Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Williams v. Ervin et al
as 2:2024cv10998
Plaintiff:
Scott Williams
Defendant:
Samuel Ervin and Zupa Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Pierce et al v. Fehr et al
as 2:2024cv10968
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Pierce and Andre D. Modisett
Defendant:
Jacob Fehr and IFS International Freight Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
