Cases 1 - 10 of 350
Schnoblen v. DTE Energy Company et al
as 2:2024cv11263
Plaintiff:
Michael Schnoblen
Defendant:
DTE Energy Company and DTE Energy Corporate Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Louks v. Belle Fountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11233
Plaintiff:
Shana Louks
Defendant:
Belle Fountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Amir Jones v. Romeo Management Group, LLC dba PUFF Cannabis Company
as 2:2024cv11159
Plaintiff:
Amir Jones
Defendant:
Romeo Management Group, LLC Doing business as PUFF Cannabis Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burgess v. The Fourmidable Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11100
Plaintiff:
Summer Burgess
Defendant:
The Fourmidable Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kaczanowski v. Driven Grow, LLC
as 1:2023cv12888
Plaintiff:
Katherine Kaczanowski
Defendant:
Driven Grow, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Baciorwoski v. Par Sterile Products, LLC
as 2:2023cv13062
Plaintiff:
Margarat Baciorwoski
Defendant:
Par Sterile Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Singleton v. Great Expressions Dental Centers, P.C.
as 2:2023cv12737
Plaintiff:
Najeana Singleton
Defendant:
Great Expressions Dental Centers, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Sicilia v. Luxottica of America Inc.,
as 2:2023cv12417
Plaintiff:
Malisa Sicilia
Defendant:
Luxottica of America Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Yalda v. Republic National Distributing Company
as 2:2023cv12638
Plaintiff:
Zaid Yalda
Defendant:
Republic National Distributing Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
