Cases 1 - 10 of 1,498
Hinton v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Shannon Rochelle Hinton
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
Dennis Thompson
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Miss
as 3:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Terry E. Johnson, III
Respondent:
Miss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v Barnes
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Forrest Thomas, III
Respondent:
Timothy Barnes and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beale v. Huffman
as 3:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Jerry Beale, Jr.
Respondent:
Brand Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sappington v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
William C. Sappington
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service, Memphis TN and Benton County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hawkins v. State of Miss.
as 1:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
George Verlon Hawkins
Respondent:
State of Miss.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winding RESTRICTED FILER v. McClure
as 4:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding *DO NOT FILE*
Defendant:
Marc McClure
Petitioner:
James C. Winding RESTRICTED FILER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norwood v. Vannoy
as 1:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Elmer Oscar Norwood
Respondent:
Wardner Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harvey v. Loden
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Edward Robert Harvey
Respondent:
Chris Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
