Cases 21 - 30 of 3,759
Roby v. MDOC et al
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Oscar Roby
Defendant:
MDOC, MS William and MS Shorts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollingsworth v. Attorney General of State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Kendrick L. Hollingsworth
Respondent:
Attorney General of State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boone v. Grooms
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Tavarus Boone
Defendant:
Sgt. Grooms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. MacDonald et al
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles Jordan
Defendant:
Tracy MacDonald, Sequcia Wren, Marcus McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. MDOC Offender Service Dept. et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Davis
Defendant:
MDOC Offender Service Dept., Mrs Garner, Shamia Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Torrey v. Vitacor et al
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Clifton T. Torrey, Sr.
Defendant:
Vitacor, MDOC CONTRACTOR (Medical), Director Laura Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Rojas et al
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Dawone Washington
Defendant:
Warden Rojas, Officer Calvin, Unknown Black Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Galvin Dwayne Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McCray v. USA
as 3:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Marquis Devon McCray
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gardner v. Cain
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
James Mortez Gardner
Respondent:
Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
