Cases 111 - 120 of 225
Nielson v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv04218
Plaintiff:
Mary Alice Nielson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunsaker v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv04209
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hunsaker
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duncan v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2017cv03347
Plaintiff:
Ronica Duncan
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Imerys Talc America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2017cv04125
Plaintiff:
Danny Moore and Barbara Moore
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lumby v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00539
Plaintiff:
Maureen Lumby
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc and Red Oak Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cowan v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 2:2017cv04097
Plaintiff:
Joey Cowan
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregg v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 6:2017cv03101
Plaintiff:
Sampson Gregg
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca LP, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 5:2017cv06015
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Morgan
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keith v. Davol Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv06013
Plaintiff:
Amber Keith
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv05011
Plaintiff:
Amanda Clark
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
