Cases 21 - 30 of 1,063
Brito v. CJR Construction Group, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Gildel Noel Ruiz Brito
Defendant:
CJR Construction Group, LLC and Centric Construction Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
**CASE OPENED IN ERROR. SEE CASE 24-00213-CV-W-SRB.**
as 4:2024cv00212
Defendant:
CJR Construction Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Archer v. Robinson Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Ryan Archer
Defendant:
Robinson Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Amsden v. LZ Logistics LLC
as 6:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Christopher Amsden
Defendant:
LZ Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Joe v. St. Louis Altenheim et al
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Benita Joe
Defendant:
St. Louis Altenheim and Malik St. Louis, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cole v. Veterans Security Services, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Daquane Cole
Defendant:
Veterans Security Services, LLC, Jason Alexander and Steve Allan Gibson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harrison v. Maid2Clean Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Harrison
Defendant:
Maid2Clean Services LLC and Elizabeth Evans
Gibbs v. Southeast Missouri Behavioral Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kayla Gibbs
Defendant:
Southeast Missouri Behavioral Health, Inc. and Mary Hays
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanders v. Keypers LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Sanders
Defendant:
Keypers LLC and Robert Dawes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Addison v. Kansas City Ultimate Security, INC
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Ron Addison
Defendant:
Kansas City Ultimate Security, INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
