Cases 11 - 20 of 1,985
Jackson v. Universal Protection Services, LLC
as 5:2024cv06042
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
Universal Protection Services, LLC doing business as Allied Universal Security Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Schilling v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Isabelle M Schilling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, James Renno and Jake Bethurem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Cogent, Inc. v. Myers
as 5:2024cv06041
Plaintiff:
Cogent, Inc. doing business as Cogent Companies
Defendant:
Adam Kurt Myers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Schilling v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Isabelle M Schilling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, James Renno and Jake Bethurem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
USA v. Edwards
as 6:2023cv03388
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Samuel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
USA v. Walters
as 6:2023cv03389
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Quenell Walters
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
USA v. Lugo
as 6:2023cv03391
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Nestor Lugo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03392
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Travis v. Knodell et al
as 3:2024cv05002
Plaintiff:
Fredric Travis
Defendant:
Robert Knodell and Janet Yellen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Silva v. O'Connell et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Christopher Z Silva
Defendant:
Kevin O'Connell, Zachary Thompson and Tim Fielder
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
