Cases 41 - 50 of 12,989
Hainline v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Joshua Blake Hainline
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Edna Anderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Lowell Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Maslo v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Antonia Maslo
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tuttle v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Lisa L. Tuttle
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Colbert v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Allison M. Colbert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Priester v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Melyssa Priester
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nelson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Christa A. Nelson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hance v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Allison Stanfield Hance
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rubottom-Langeneckert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lynn Rubottom-Langeneckert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
