Cases 11 - 20 of 7,956
BLOCKER v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv05679
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
ALEX TORRES and ATLANTIC COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. ACPD et al
as 1:2024cv05498
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
ACPD and ALEY TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGOS RESTO v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv05500
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
CHERYL LNU, KELLY WARDER and CAPTAIN MADLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMENAMIN v. SPIRO et al
as 1:2024cv05538
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCMENAMIN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SPIRO, SERGEANT SLOAN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER-HILL et al v. ACJF et al
as 1:2024cv05515
Plaintiff:
JASON T. SPENCER-HILL, ATEBA MAME HASSAN, NOBLE EL and others
Defendant:
ACJF, ACPS, DAVID KELSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITROS v. CASTILLO/MARR et al
as 1:2024cv05420
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Defendant:
MELISSA CASTILLO/MARR, A. M. and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE BUENA BARRACKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. HARDDEN et al
as 1:2024cv05442
Plaintiff:
GARY MICHAEL KING
Defendant:
REV. P. HARDDEN, SGT. E. HEADLEY and KESHIA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODWARD v. MATLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv05468
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. WOODWARD
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MATLOCK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROWN and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POSEY v. PARROTT
as 2:2024cv05460
Plaintiff:
H. TORY POSEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY M. PARROTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
