Cases 61 - 70 of 18,909
THOMPSON v. EICKHOFF et al
as 1:2024cv04644
Plaintiff:
MARLON D. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL EICKHOFF and SGT. GOVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv04645
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARK WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, DR. FARRAH AHMEDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOOKMAN v. KEATING et al
as 1:2024cv00940
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BOOKMAN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KEATING, TIMOTHY STEINMETZ, JORGE A. RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KRASNIKOV v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv01042
Petitioner:
PHILIP KRASNIKOV
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BILLIP v. THE NEW JERSEY CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE AT UMD et al
as 2:2024cv01438
Plaintiff:
LAMELLE LEE BILLIP
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE AT UMD, UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE & DENTISTRY OF NJ, NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. PATTERSON
as 1:2024cv04516
Plaintiff:
KYWAN MARSHALL and JADIS VALENTINE
Defendant:
ROBERT PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04582
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GARRETT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv04598
Plaintiff:
JACOB TIMOTHY GARRETT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS N.J.D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAUZO v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04545
Petitioner:
CARLOS SAUZO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
POSSO v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv04555
Petitioner:
28235-078 DAYRUN ALBORNOZ POSSO
Respondent:
WARDEN and FCI, FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
