Cases 61 - 70 of 6,714
NICOLESCU v. WARDEN FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
EMANUEL NICOLESCU
Respondent:
WARDEN FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HENRY v. DAVIS
as 2:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
BASIM HENRY
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JUSTO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FITZGERALD v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv01441
Petitioner:
DAWUD FITZGERALD
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and MATTHEW PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
HARRISON LEWIS, III
Respondent:
STEPHANIE THOMPSON and RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FITZGERALD v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv00997
Petitioner:
DAWMEEN FITZGERALD
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TACCETTA v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
MARTIN TACCETTA
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GANDY v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR.
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MENDOZA v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv23215
Petitioner:
ALBERTO MENDOZA
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WELCH v. DAVIS
as 2:2023cv23301
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WELCH
Defendant:
BRUCE DAVIS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
