Cases 71 - 80 of 7,944
MERCEDES v. GLADING et al
as 2:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO M MERCEDES
Defendant:
JO ASTRID GLADING, MICHAEL DENNY, ANGIE BOLIVAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IBRAHIM v. EMRICH et al
as 3:2024cv01780
Plaintiff:
YUSUF IBRAHIM
Defendant:
AMY EMRICH and DERRICK BODTMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
ENRIQUE HERRERA v. HUDSON COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ENRIQUE HERRERA
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azcona v. State of NJ et al
as 3:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Daniel Azcona
Defendant:
State of NJ, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., NJ DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANCHEZ v. PRADHANANG
as 2:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
DR. LILIBETH PRADHANANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. GRELLA
as 2:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
NICHOLAS GRELLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY and ESSEX COUNTY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVENS, JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO, HECTOR TOLENTINO and others
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELL PATH, DR. IBRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUSSELL v. MONMOUTH COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE TRUSSELL
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY, SHAUN GOLDEN, THEOADORE FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT JR. v. SGT. EL SLOAN et al
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. BRYANT JR.
Defendant:
SGT. EL SLOAN and OFC. JEFFERIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
