Cases 11 - 20 of 2,712
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rivera v. Naifeh et al
as 4:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Idalys Torres Rivera
Counter Claimant:
Charo Naifeh
Defendant:
Casa Light Realty, LLC and Platinum Investment Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Harmon v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Clark Harmon
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Gentner Drummond and Nowata County, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Jones et al v. Golden et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lynn Jones, J.R.D. and Stacy-Lynn Jones
Defendant:
Douglas W Golden, Pamela B Hammers and Jason C Serner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins et al v. Mulkey et al
as 4:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Milton David Collins and Ericka Collins
Defendant:
Dylan Mulkey, Tim Tipton and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jolliff et al v. City of Catoosa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Jolliff and Kyle Parnell
Defendant:
City of Catoosa, Oklahoma, Cody Workman, Robert Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
