Cases 21 - 30 of 1,559
Sims, Jr. v. State of Tennessee, The
as 3:2023cv00992
Petitioner:
Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Haven, Jr. v. Brun
as 3:2023cv01097
Petitioner:
Joseph Lester Haven, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv01165
Petitioner:
Adarion Morris
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fanter v. State of TN
as 3:2023cv01080
Petitioner:
Steven Joseph Fanter
Respondent:
State of TN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Brun
as 3:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Earsel Delano Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical et al
as 3:2023cv01155
Petitioner:
Jennifer Widener Larsen
Respondent:
Wellness Path Medical, Sheriff Steve Reams and Sheriff f/n/u Heyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Price v. Watwood
as 3:2023cv01140
Petitioner:
Dustin Shawn Price
Respondent:
Warden Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00919
Petitioner:
Jamarces J. Watson
Respondent:
West Tennessee State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coley v. Watwood
as 3:2023cv00883
Petitioner:
William Coley
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
