Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Woods, et al v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration, et al
as 1:2016cv01289
Petitioner:
John B Woods and Tom McDonald
Respondent:
United States Drug Enforcement Administration , Loretta E. Lynch , United States Department Of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Woods v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency
as 1:2016cv01288
Plaintiff:
John B Woods
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Taylor v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv02475
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ray Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Pugh v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv02812
Plaintiff:
Dontre Pugh
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Murray v. McDonald et al
as 2:2015cv02611
Petitioner:
Ian F. Murray
Defendant:
Robert A. McDonald
Respondent:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hidar v. Vilsack
as 2:2015cv02245
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack
Plaintiff:
Gamel A. Hidar
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Watkins v. Tennessee Department of Human Services, et al.
as 2:2014cv02751
Petitioner:
Myra Watkins
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Human Services and Raquel Hatter
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Hicks v. Burwell
as 2:2014cv02634
Plaintiff:
Katie Hicks
Defendant:
Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sewell v. Tennessee Department of Human Services
as 2:2014cv02595
Petitioner:
Margaret Sewell
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Human Services
Respondent:
Raquel Hatter
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Mayberry v. Tennessee Department of Human Services
as 2:2014cv02533
Plaintiff:
Hazel Mayberry
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Human Services and Raquel Hatter
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
