Cases 61 - 70 of 814
Dubriel v. No Spill, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02412
Plaintiff:
Paul Dubriel
Defendant:
No Spill, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dobbs et al v. Microport Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02394
Defendant:
Microport Orthopedics, Inc., Wright Medical Group, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Dobbs and Theresa Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02199
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
James Bell and Sue Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Black et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2020cv02202
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Cathleen J. Black and James L. Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burkhart-Givens v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02124
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dolores Burkhart Givens and Dolores Burkhart-Givens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02157
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earles v. Lens.com, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02251
Defendant:
Lens.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paige Earles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanley v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv02239
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Naifeh v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv02234
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Sam Naifeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murren v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv02238
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Elsie Murren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
