Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Nelson v. RIVR Media et al
as 2:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Susan Nelson
Defendant:
RIVR Media and A&E Networks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baldwin v. Aviva Life and Annuity
as 2:2016cv00202
Plaintiff:
Richard Baldwin
Defendant:
Aviva Life and Annuity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eagle Air Med et al v. Sentinel Air Medical Alliance et al
as 2:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
Eagle Air Med and Valley Med Flight
Defendant:
Sentinel Air Medical Alliance and Jeffrey Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vincent et al v. Utah Plastic Surgery Society et al
as 2:2012cv01048
Plaintiff:
Drake Vincent and Benjamin Dunkley
Defendant:
Utah Plastic Surgery Society, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, American Board of Plastic Surgery, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Munguia v. Master Cleaning
as 2:2015cv00608
Plaintiff:
Jesus Munguia
Defendant:
Master Cleaning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
International Payment Services et al v. CardPaymentOptions.com et al
as 1:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
International Payment Services and Adam Bentley
Defendant:
CardPaymentOptions.com and Phillip Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy v. Wal-Mart Stores
as 2:2015cv00346
Plaintiff:
Lane J. Timothy
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDonald et al v. University of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
George McDonald and Diana Schaffer
Defendant:
University of Utah , Cheryl Wright , Scott Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barela v. Barela et al
as 2:2014cv00920
Plaintiff:
Vincent Paul Barela
Defendant:
Judy Barela and Luke Barela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diesel Power Source et al v. Crazy Carl's Turbos et al
as 2:2014cv00826
Plaintiff:
Diesel Power Source and Bret Park
Defendant:
Crazy Carl's Turbos and Carl Tetreault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
