Disability Insurance Cases filed in Washington
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,568
Gage v. O'Malley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv05026
Plaintiff: Cody Gage
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff: Pamela Jane Randolph
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Briskey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03060
Plaintiff: Kevin John Briskey
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goodell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff: Ranee T Goodell
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Corby v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05043
Plaintiff: Ricky Corby
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Suarez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03061
Plaintiff: Felipe Suarez
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Krebs v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03058
Plaintiff: Nathan Krebs
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodriguez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03059
Plaintiff: Francis Joe Rodriguez
Defendant: Martin O'Malley and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05206
Plaintiff: Ann Robinson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fisher v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff: Melissa O Fisher
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?