Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 44,529
(PC) Jackson v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff: Cornel Jackson
Defendant: Tyson Pouge, Esteves, Cpt. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Taylor v. District Attorney
as 2:2024cv01400
Petitioner: Robert A. Taylor
Respondent: District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv01390
Petitioner: Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Green v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00576
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Santoro, et al.
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff: Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant: Kelly Santoro, K. Mixon, M. Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Collins v. Veach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01369
Plaintiff: Bobby Lee Collins
Defendant: Veach, C. York, J. Marfil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chavez v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv01384
Plaintiff: Michael Ray Chavez
Defendant: Rob St. Andre, Mitchell Knedler, Darrow Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Watson v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00567
Petitioner: Dale William Watson
Respondent: Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner: Charles David Coker
Respondent: T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Martin v. Price
as 1:2024cv00565
Petitioner: Robert E Martin
Respondent: Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?