Cases 11 - 20 of 1,984
Schilling v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Isabelle M Schilling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, James Renno and Jake Bethurem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
USA v. Morris
as 6:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Kendell Morris
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
USA v. Cerno
as 6:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Matthew Cerno
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Silva v. O'Connell et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Christopher Z Silva
Defendant:
Kevin O'Connell, Zachary Thompson and Tim Fielder
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc. et al
as 4:2024mc09002
Petitioner:
CC Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Provisur Technologies, Inc.
Respondent:
Weber, Inc., Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Breidenbach and Weber Maschinenbau GmbH Neubrandenburg
**CASE FILED IN ERROR - CASE CLOSED**
as 4:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
W. O.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Banik, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Travis v. Knodell et al
as 3:2024cv05002
Plaintiff:
Fredric Travis
Defendant:
Robert Knodell and Janet Yellen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. SGDS Enterprises, LLC
as 2:2023cv04236
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
SGDS Enterprises, LLC doing business as Advantage Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Promissory Note
USA v. Lugo
as 6:2023cv03391
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Nestor Lugo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03392
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
