Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Mereness v. United State Office of Personnel Management
as 4:2015cv00486
Plaintiff:
Michael Mereness
Defendant:
United States Office of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8901
Gus's Market, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Gus's Market, Inc. and Ghassan Al-Hamid
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sell Gas, LLC v. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
as 6:2014cv03521
Plaintiff:
Sell Gas, LLC
Defendant:
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1903
Perez-Garcia v. Winkowski et al
as 4:2014cv02014
Plaintiff:
Jose Perez-Garcia
Defendant:
Thomas Winkowski, Jeh Johnson and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Butler v. Bowers et al
as 4:2014cv01015
Defendant:
William L. Bowers and Eric Holder
Plaintiff:
David Butler
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sovereign International, Inc. et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2014cv00941
Plaintiff:
Sovereign International, Inc. and Deon van Dyk
Defendant:
Leon Rodriguez, Jeh Johnson and Kathy Baran
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Mohammad e al. v United States of America
as 4:2014cv01802
Plaintiff:
Eyad Mohammad and Sulton Palace Cafe and Bakery
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Engaged in Life, LLC et al v. Johnson et al
as 5:2014cv06112
Plaintiff:
Engaged in LIfe, LLC and Helga Namale
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson , Leon Rodriguez , Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Shak, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 4:2014cv01742
Plaintiff:
Iyas Fares and Shak, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mace v. McDermott et al
as 2:2014cv04173
Plaintiff:
James Webster Mace
Defendant:
David E. McDermott and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
