Cases 81 - 90 of 3,692
USA v. Kaipat
as 6:2023cv03094
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Cling Kaipat
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Country Club Bank v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 4:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Country Club Bank
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Parade Park Homes, Inc.
USA v. Torres-Navarro
as 6:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Juan Torres-Navarro
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Ada v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Ada
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03071
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Thompson v. Replacements, Ltd.
as 4:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Dennis Thompson
Defendant:
Replacements, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. v. Sapient Capital, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Sapient Capital, LLC and Sapient Capital Founders, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of St. Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2023cv06023
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
City of St. Joseph, Missouri and City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ebaugh v. Medicredit, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Mary Ebaugh
Defendant:
Medicredit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Courtney
as 6:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Matthew Courtney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
