Cases 41 - 50 of 3,410
LUIS ZAPIACH, M.D. v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2024cv04377
Plaintiff:
LUIS ZAPIACH, M.D.
Defendant:
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
GELBER v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS et al
as 2:2024cv04236
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS GELBER, HACKENSACK DENTAL ASSOCIATES and DOUGLAS GELBER, DMD, LLC
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS, HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION and DENTAL NETWORK OF AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. TRANSIT CONSTRUCTION, CORP.
as 2:2024cv04153
Petitioner:
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
TRANSIT CONSTRUCTION, CORP.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. CTX INFRASTRUCTURE, LLC.
as 1:2024cv04142
Petitioner:
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 AND 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
CTX INFRASTRUCTURE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 et al v. LUCAS CONSTRUCTION, GROUP, INC.
as 3:2024cv04145
Petitioner:
LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 172 AND LABORERS' LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
LUCAS CONSTRUCTION, GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. LIMA CHARLIE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 3:2024cv04127
Petitioner:
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
LIMA CHARLIE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. DATA AXLE, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv04181
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
Data Axle, Inc., RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and ABC COMPANIES 1-10, FICTICIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Non-Motor Vehicle
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. MIKE FITZPATRICK CONTRACTORS
as 2:2024cv04036
Petitioner:
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS.472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
MIKE FITZPATRICK CONTRACTORS
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY (NHA)
as 2:2024cv02697
Petitioner:
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY (NHA)
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. KNIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP
as 3:2024cv02693
Petitioner:
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
KNIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
