Cases 81 - 90 of 456
WHITE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2021cv15466
Plaintiff:
DAWUD WHITE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
KENDRICK v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 3:2021cv15447
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KENDRICK
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
KENDRICK v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv15447
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KENDRICK
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MONCREASE v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2021cv15462
Plaintiff:
ZENOLA MONCREASE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
ELLIS v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2021cv15463
Plaintiff:
JOHN ELLIS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
RIVERA v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv15020
Plaintiff:
JOSE RIVERA
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP., NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., and NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SIMMONS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2021cv14308
Plaintiff:
ERIC SIMMONS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MALTEZ v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2021cv13938
Plaintiff:
INGRID MALTEZ
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC. and NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BURKART v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC.
as 2:2021cv13654
Plaintiff:
JOHN BURKART
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MAXWELL v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2021cv12828
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MAXWELL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
