Cases 31 - 40 of 114
CUMBERLAND MALL ASSOCIATES v. REGAL CINEMAS, INC.
as 1:2021cv05023
Plaintiff:
CUMBERLAND MALL ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
REGAL CINEMAS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMD PERFORMANCE MATERIALS CORP. v. 50 MEISTER LLC et al
as 3:2021cv04890
Plaintiff:
EMD PERFORMANCE MATERIALS CORP.
Defendant:
SAADIA GROUP LLC, and 50 MEISTER LLC
Not Classified By Court:
GLENN BERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
HALL v. KEYES
as 1:2021cv04748
Defendant:
KRISTINE KEYES
Plaintiff:
RYAN HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MBK HOLDINGS LLC v. MATTRESS FIRM, INC. SUCCESSOR TO SLEEPY'S
as 2:2021cv04489
Defendant:
MATTRESS FIRM, INC. SUCCESSOR TO SLEEPY'S
Plaintiff:
MBK HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HCP III EAGLE LLC v. SLEEPY'S LLC
as 1:2020cv15603
Defendant:
SLEEPY'S LLC
Plaintiff:
HCP III EAGLE LLC
PIEDMONT ASSOCIATES, LLC v. MATTRESS FIRM
as 3:2020cv15010
Plaintiff:
PIEDMONT ASSOCIATES, LLC c/o P.F. PASBJERG DEV. CO. and PIEDMONT ASSOCIATES, LLC doing business as P.F. PASBJERG DEV. CO.
Defendant:
MATTRESS FIRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON ROAD PROJECT, LLC et al v. HOST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 3:2020cv14346
Defendant:
HOST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
SIMPSON ROAD INVESTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMSEY INTERSTATE CENTER LLC v. DSW SHOE WAREHOUSE, INC.
as 2:2020cv12710
Defendant:
DSW SHOE WAREHOUSE, INC.
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY INTERSTATE CENTER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MIDSTATE MALL LLC v. DSW SHOE WAREHOUSE, INC.
as 2:2020cv12699
Plaintiff:
MIDSTATE MALL LLC
Defendant:
DSW SHOE WAREHOUSE, INC.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
RAMSEY INTERSTATE CENTER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS CIRCLE PROPERTIES, LLC v. LANE FERDINAND LAW OFFICES, P.C.
as 2:2020cv11831
Defendant:
LANE FERDINAND LAW OFFICES, P.C.
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CIRCLE PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
