Cases 61 - 70 of 7,954
IBRAHIM v. EMRICH et al
as 3:2024cv01780
Plaintiff:
YUSUF IBRAHIM
Defendant:
AMY EMRICH and DERRICK BODTMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
SANCHEZ v. GRELLA
as 2:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
NICHOLAS GRELLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY and ESSEX COUNTY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
K. BULLOCK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. PRADIHANANG
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
LILIBETH PRADIHANANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BILLIP v. THE NEW JERSEY CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE AT UMD et al
as 2:2024cv01438
Plaintiff:
LAMELLE LEE BILLIP
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE AT UMD, UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE & DENTISTRY OF NJ, NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. PRADHANANG
as 2:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
DR. LILIBETH PRADHANANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIMBISH v. GORNEAU et al
as 1:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RASHEED WIMBISH
Defendant:
OFFICER RONALD A. GORNEAU, OFFICER DIAMOND B. FUENTES, OFFICER DAVID LASASSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. AVILES
as 2:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PIERCE
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGOS RESTO v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
JOSE RICARDO BURGOS RESTO
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH and DR. IBRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
