Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,130
Traylor v. Friend
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff: Abudu Imamu Traylor
Defendant: Stanley Friend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne v. Vincent et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff: Jack Lee Osborne
Defendant: Capt. Vincent, Deputy Fittings, Deputy Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Multnomah County Jail
as 3:2024cv00772
Plaintiff: Raymond LaVaughn Grant
Defendant: Multnomah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv00766
Plaintiff: Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant: State of Oregon, Honorable Judge Edmonds and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Immergut
as 2:2024cv00762
Plaintiff: Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant: Karin J. Immergut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00753
Plaintiff: Evan Middleton
Defendant: Erin Reyes, C. Dieter, Mike Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheikhuna v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff: Awes Sheikhuna
Defendant: Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watterson v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00732
Petitioner: Elijah Watterson
Respondent: Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goering-Runyan v. USA
as 3:2024cv00735
Petitioner: Daniel Lynn Goering-Runyan
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Taylor et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00726
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor, Schylar Flick and Dywane Russell Crum
Defendant: Oregon Department of Corrections and Eastern Oregon Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?