Cases 41 - 50 of 10,124
Hamilton v. Teague et al
as 6:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Hamilton
Defendant:
Peter Teague, Walmart Albany Oregon and Michelle Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alday v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00550
Petitioner:
Juan Alday
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Case v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
David K. Case
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Chris Shupe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Amy Bender
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, David Ewell, Robert Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00511
Petitioner:
William Thompson
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Robert S. White
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. State of Oregon
as 1:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Robert S. White
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Sidney Van Newton
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ledford v. Lane County Adult Corrections
as 6:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dylan Joseph Ledford
Defendant:
Lane County Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledford v. Oregon State Correctional Institution
as 6:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Dylan Joseph Ledford
Defendant:
Oregon State Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
