Cases 61 - 70 of 24,500
Mason v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
as 2:2024cv02240
Petitioner:
Devonte Mason
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wingate v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wingate
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02256
Petitioner:
Johnathan Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Jon Walton and Frank Strata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Moore
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Frank Strata, Jon Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegel v. TDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Hegel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Cortez Bennett
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Tavarie Alexander Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Norman et al v. R. Edward et al
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Norman, Rooks Chazsity and Retic Jessica
Defendant:
R. Edward, J. William and Davidson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee
Defendant:
Grady Perry, Amber Paden and CoreCivic/SCCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
